Skip to main content

As we transition to the opt out system, the BBC will be at the heart of promoting a culture of organ donation

This year, the so called law of presumed consent in organ donation will enter into force in Scotland and England. If you are an adult and not within an excluded group, your main organs maybe retrieved after you die and, if deemed suitable, used for a person on the organ waiting list. This, unless you had previously expressed your decision to opt out of the Organ Donor Register. Moving to an opt out system is significant because it usually helps to increase the pool of organs available for donation, as illustrated by the Welsh case and many other examples in the world. 

I am starting this blog to reflect on the various forms of communication that will stem from the new legal framework. Since I started researching the subject in February last year, I have become familiar with the various ways in which communication media impinge upon public knowledge and attitudes about organ donation. I therefore intend to write commentary about coverage in the news media, content on the internet and social platforms that the transition into the opt-out system is likely to trigger.

The role of the BBC in raising awareness about organ donation

I will pay special interest to public communication efforts which are likely to promote a culture of organ donation. The BBC, in this context, is a suitable example of an organisation that for sometime has been producing and disseminating content which creates awareness about the benefits of organ transplantation and the new legal framework. For example, in Heart Transplant: A Chance to Live, broadcast on BBC 2, director James Newton told the story of seven patients on the organ waiting list, powerfully conveying the permanent life-and-death situation in which they live whilst reflecting on the nature of the transplant process and the advancements that are enabling to increase the pool of available organs.

Crucially, this documentary helps to reflect on how the collaboration between multiple stakeholders, from health professionals and care providers, to universities, the news media, families and the patients themselves, can result in media narratives with the potential to make us empathise with the pain of others.
The BBC will most certainly continue to be a key source of valuable public communication about organ donation, as illustrated by an interview with a family that, among other issues, raised one key limitations of the opt-out system: it will not increase the availability of organs suitable for transplants on children.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rethinking Blood Donation: The Economics, Messaging, and Challenges

Blood transfusion is a critical medical procedure, yet the approach to securing a safe and sufficient blood supply involves complex economic, communicative, and logistical challenges which are difficult to understand when the messaging around it is haunted by catastrophic precedent such as the one that destroyed the lives of thousands in the UK in the 1970s and 1980s.  Reflecting on these aspects reveals the importance of treating blood as a public good , rather than a commodity, central to preventing future crises like the one the news media will abundantly be reflecting when findings from the Infected Blood Inquiry are finally published. The Power of Messaging in Blood Donation Campaigns Effective communication in blood donation campaigns is crucial to ensuring a stable blood supply. Research indicates that the nature of these messages significantly influences public perception and willingness to donate.  Traditional slogans like "Save Lives" are common, but recent studies ...

Decoding NHS’s tweets with speech act theory and the encoding/decoding model

 In the era of social media, organizations like the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust are leveraging platforms like Twitter to communicate with publics in multifaceted ways. A fascinating case in point is how the NHS trust used Twitter to communicate about  #GeordieHospital, a documentary series  filmed on various of its premises and broadcast on Channel 4. Analysing these tweets through the lens of speech act theory is a fascinating if laborious task which is of value to tackle one of the many challenges of understanding human communication in the digital age. NHS digital speech acts are multifunctional ( created via OpenArt ) Breaking tweets into speech acts Speech act theory, a cornerstone of linguistic philosophy, breaks down communication into three types of acts: locutionary (the act of saying something), illocutionary (the intent behind saying something), and perlocutionary (the effect of saying something). In the context of the NHS trust's tweets,...

Biomediatized Directives: The NHS and the Art of the Twitter Nudge

Biomediatized directives subtly leverage a positive framing of the healthcare system in the hope this may influence how the public feels about it Healthcare organizations need to explore innovative communication strategies, particularly in a landscape increasingly marked by public distrust towards healthcare messaging.  Twitter offers a dynamic platform for the NHS (National Health Service) to experiment with new communication tones, with the medical docu-series Geordie Hospital acting as a focal point. Screenshot of Geordie Hospital's homepage on an NHS trust's site  What are Biomediatized Directives? Biomediatized directives are a category of tweets categorized to refer to messages crafted by an NHS trust to subtly encourage viewers to watch Geordie Hospital.  They are characterized by their blend of praise for healthcare workers with promotional language, framing the show as a realistic portrayal of the healthcare system. For instance, a tweet may call to "Meet some...