Skip to main content

On how the observation of public discourse in the digital age could help address the crisis of organ shortages for transplants

(Gabriel Moreno) - In this post I discuss a line of inquiry I have been following with a colleague that focuses on the public communication of organ transplantation. What is public communication will be contentious in the age of post-truth politics, but the meaning of organ transplantation is unequivocal and therefore easier to identify in terms of its public discussion. Organ transplantation, simply put, involves the replacement of a vital internal component in a person’s body, due to a malfunction of the organ involved that is life-threatening. 

Even this rather basic definition can be problematic since the notion of replacing a body component can trigger ideas about the existence of a market for body organs that feeds misconceptions about how the systems of allocation for organs function in health systems. We will keep it for now so for operative purposes, no pun intended, in order to explain how my plan to investigate the “public communication of organ transplantation and organ donation project” at Northumbria University works. 

 For starters, the project will draw on a methodology of observation of public discourses about the broad subject of organ donation. I became familiarised with this methodology when I first taught the subject of “communication observatories” (or observatorios de la comunicación) at the Jesuit University of Guadalajara (Mexico) at the Department of Sociocultural Studies (DESO). The approach was developed in fronts such as local communities, NGOs, journalists, and academia advocating for human rights and freedom of speech in Latin America. The approach mirrored similar ones followed by groups and associations in more mature capitalist economies advocating for religious and consumer-oriented activities. 

 The element in common involved the systematic analysis of media content about the subject of interest to a particular observatorio, in the assumption that keeping record of content published about the subject of interest would enable understanding of its reality. This of course is problematic, since we know that published content reflects on the point of view and/or interests of a publisher, a matter that is even more complex in the age of what Megan Boler and Elizabeth Davis describe as the affective politics of digital media. 

But digital media and the character of public communication today come with possibilities that render the observation of public discourse about organ transplantation as a valuable tool for its study. Such an approach can help shed light on, for example, the role that communication media have in helping to tackle the challenges of organ shortages by, arguably, incentivising a culture of organ donation. More modestly, the approach is useful to visualise the characteristics of the notions and ideas (“the discourses”) that circulate in societies about the subject, potentially shaping individual and collective attitudes towards it.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rethinking Blood Donation: The Economics, Messaging, and Challenges

Blood transfusion is a critical medical procedure, yet the approach to securing a safe and sufficient blood supply involves complex economic, communicative, and logistical challenges which are difficult to understand when the messaging around it is haunted by catastrophic precedent such as the one that destroyed the lives of thousands in the UK in the 1970s and 1980s.  Reflecting on these aspects reveals the importance of treating blood as a public good , rather than a commodity, central to preventing future crises like the one the news media will abundantly be reflecting when findings from the Infected Blood Inquiry are finally published. The Power of Messaging in Blood Donation Campaigns Effective communication in blood donation campaigns is crucial to ensuring a stable blood supply. Research indicates that the nature of these messages significantly influences public perception and willingness to donate.  Traditional slogans like "Save Lives" are common, but recent studies ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Decoding NHS’s tweets with speech act theory and the encoding/decoding model

 In the era of social media, organizations like the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust are leveraging platforms like Twitter to communicate with publics in multifaceted ways. A fascinating case in point is how the NHS trust used Twitter to communicate about  #GeordieHospital, a documentary series  filmed on various of its premises and broadcast on Channel 4. Analysing these tweets through the lens of speech act theory is a fascinating if laborious task which is of value to tackle one of the many challenges of understanding human communication in the digital age. NHS digital speech acts are multifunctional ( created via OpenArt ) Breaking tweets into speech acts Speech act theory, a cornerstone of linguistic philosophy, breaks down communication into three types of acts: locutionary (the act of saying something), illocutionary (the intent behind saying something), and perlocutionary (the effect of saying something). In the context of the NHS trust's tweets,...
Post a Comment
Read more

When multimodal speech speaks a thousand images and words

In today's communication landscape, multimodal speech, based on text, emojis, links, pictures and more arguably augments the nature of our messages  As part of a literature review I've been working on the use of speech acts on social media, I came across the distinction that authors of a study make between "Speech and Image Acts" in branding messages on social media.  Having for sometime settled for the idea that speech acts are multimodal in today's hybrid polymedia system, I wander whether the need to distinguish between speech and image acts is necessary.  Multimodal speaks a thousand images and words: replacing the old adage (Created with ChatGPT) The way we communicate online defies simple categorization. A single social media post can be a demand, a plea, an informative statement, and a source of visual delight – all at once.  Does it make sense, then, to stick with the traditional distinction between "speech acts" (focused on words) and "imag...
Post a Comment
Read more