Skip to main content

On how the observation of public discourse in the digital age could help address the crisis of organ shortages for transplants

(Gabriel Moreno) - In this post I discuss a line of inquiry I have been following with a colleague that focuses on the public communication of organ transplantation. What is public communication will be contentious in the age of post-truth politics, but the meaning of organ transplantation is unequivocal and therefore easier to identify in terms of its public discussion. Organ transplantation, simply put, involves the replacement of a vital internal component in a person’s body, due to a malfunction of the organ involved that is life-threatening. 

Even this rather basic definition can be problematic since the notion of replacing a body component can trigger ideas about the existence of a market for body organs that feeds misconceptions about how the systems of allocation for organs function in health systems. We will keep it for now so for operative purposes, no pun intended, in order to explain how my plan to investigate the “public communication of organ transplantation and organ donation project” at Northumbria University works. 

 For starters, the project will draw on a methodology of observation of public discourses about the broad subject of organ donation. I became familiarised with this methodology when I first taught the subject of “communication observatories” (or observatorios de la comunicación) at the Jesuit University of Guadalajara (Mexico) at the Department of Sociocultural Studies (DESO). The approach was developed in fronts such as local communities, NGOs, journalists, and academia advocating for human rights and freedom of speech in Latin America. The approach mirrored similar ones followed by groups and associations in more mature capitalist economies advocating for religious and consumer-oriented activities. 

 The element in common involved the systematic analysis of media content about the subject of interest to a particular observatorio, in the assumption that keeping record of content published about the subject of interest would enable understanding of its reality. This of course is problematic, since we know that published content reflects on the point of view and/or interests of a publisher, a matter that is even more complex in the age of what Megan Boler and Elizabeth Davis describe as the affective politics of digital media. 

But digital media and the character of public communication today come with possibilities that render the observation of public discourse about organ transplantation as a valuable tool for its study. Such an approach can help shed light on, for example, the role that communication media have in helping to tackle the challenges of organ shortages by, arguably, incentivising a culture of organ donation. More modestly, the approach is useful to visualise the characteristics of the notions and ideas (“the discourses”) that circulate in societies about the subject, potentially shaping individual and collective attitudes towards it.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When a man is so bad he doesn't deserve a pig's heart

(Gabriel Moreno) - In words of The Washington Post writers , David Bennett became 'a medical pioneer' after the heart of a genetically modified pig was used to replace his failing heart. But the significance of this medical breakthrough in which he had been involved was eclipsed by the fact he 'had been convicted in 1988' after stabbing a man seven times. Attention grabbing as Johnson and Wan's article is, the so called 'ethics of a second chance' angle it deploys belongs within a category of public discourse that has taxed the ability of societies to deal with the organ shortage crisis  all over the world. For several decades, medical and social scientists have known that news media are one of the most effective forms of public education interventions to reduce the shortage of organs for patients who need a transplant for a shot at carrying on with their lives.  As put by Rafael Matesanz , architect of Spain's renowned national system of transplantation...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rethinking Blood Donation: The Economics, Messaging, and Challenges

Blood transfusion is a critical medical procedure, yet the approach to securing a safe and sufficient blood supply involves complex economic, communicative, and logistical challenges which are difficult to understand when the messaging around it is haunted by catastrophic precedent such as the one that destroyed the lives of thousands in the UK in the 1970s and 1980s.  Reflecting on these aspects reveals the importance of treating blood as a public good , rather than a commodity, central to preventing future crises like the one the news media will abundantly be reflecting when findings from the Infected Blood Inquiry are finally published. The Power of Messaging in Blood Donation Campaigns Effective communication in blood donation campaigns is crucial to ensuring a stable blood supply. Research indicates that the nature of these messages significantly influences public perception and willingness to donate.  Traditional slogans like "Save Lives" are common, but recent studies ...
Post a Comment
Read more

When multimodal speech speaks a thousand images and words

In today's communication landscape, multimodal speech, based on text, emojis, links, pictures and more arguably augments the nature of our messages  As part of a literature review I've been working on the use of speech acts on social media, I came across the distinction that authors of a study make between "Speech and Image Acts" in branding messages on social media.  Having for sometime settled for the idea that speech acts are multimodal in today's hybrid polymedia system, I wander whether the need to distinguish between speech and image acts is necessary.  Multimodal speaks a thousand images and words: replacing the old adage (Created with ChatGPT) The way we communicate online defies simple categorization. A single social media post can be a demand, a plea, an informative statement, and a source of visual delight – all at once.  Does it make sense, then, to stick with the traditional distinction between "speech acts" (focused on words) and "imag...
Post a Comment
Read more