Skip to main content

Overcoming Media Reluctance: How a Diverse Messaging Strategy Can Boost Vaccination Advocacy

As the UK grapples with the resurgence of whooping cough, it becomes increasingly important for public health messaging to adopt a nuanced and multi-strategy approach to vaccination appeals.

In recent weeks, the UK has witnessed a notable surge in whooping cough cases, a severe infection particularly dangerous to children and pregnant women.

Public health messaging has strongly emphasized vaccination as a crucial measure to combat this infection. Naturally, this is the case in the official communication of the UK Health Security Agency.

BBC's coverage highlights worrying rise of cases

However, a quick examination of the mainstream media coverage reveals what could be described as a hesitancy to include direct vaccination appeals, as can be surmised from a BBC’s report which emphasized the threatening aspect, and a local news report which highlighted its regional spread.

While mentioning a decline in vaccination rates, the coverage avoided direct calls to vaccinate and merely included contact information and advice readers to consult with their GP, suggesting a cautious approach to vaccine advocacy.

This reticence in public health messaging to outright recommend vaccination could be attributed to a complex landscape of vaccine hesitancy within the population.

Example of coverage with comments not available to read

(By Gabriel Moreno) – As consequence, news organizations have resorted to blocking comments sections where readers express attitudes against vaccination.

Studies hint towards a multi-pronged approach

Scholarly research offers insights into this phenomenon, presenting a diverse array of public responses to vaccination appeals.

Studies have delved into various strategies, from emotional and rational appeals (see Žuliček, Čerepinko and Bagarić on page 145) to the impact of animated videos, and how different speech types can significantly influence public attitudes toward vaccination.

At a time when public trust in health messaging has declined, the research is arguably an invitation to explored a multifaceted approach when it comes to communicating about such essential matters as vaccination.

By leveraging these diverse strategies, organizations involved in health messaging can tailor their messaging to address specific concerns and barriers to vaccination within different segments of the population. 

For example, campaigns that combine factual information with empathetic narratives could resonate more deeply with hesitant individuals, encouraging a more positive response to vaccination appeals.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Organ transplants: why so many people are put off donating

Organ transplants: why so many people are put off donating irinabdw/Shutterstock (I'm republishing this article from The Conversation partly as an opportunity to acknowledge the progress that the UK has made towards reducing the number of cases in which families refuse to donate the organs of loved ones after they die. With the consent/authorisation rate going up 2% in 2018/19 to 67%, the country is much closer to the 80% target that would dramatically improve transplant outcomes, per the latest   Organ Donation and Transplantation Activity Report . But there is more work to be done) Gabriel Moreno Esparza , Northumbria University, Newcastle and Stephen Clark , Northumbria University, Newcastle It’s well known that there’s a worldwide shortage of organ donors. More than 100,000 organ transplants have taken place around the world every year since 2008 but this is way below what’s needed . In the UK , for example, figures

When multimodal speech speaks a thousand images and words

In today's communication landscape, multimodal speech, based on text, emojis, links, pictures and more arguably augments the nature of our messages  As part of a literature review I've been working on the use of speech acts on social media, I came across the distinction that authors of a study make between "Speech and Image Acts" in branding messages on social media.  Having for sometime settled for the idea that speech acts are multimodal in today's hybrid polymedia system, I wander whether the need to distinguish between speech and image acts is necessary.  Multimodal speaks a thousand images and words: replacing the old adage (Created with ChatGPT) The way we communicate online defies simple categorization. A single social media post can be a demand, a plea, an informative statement, and a source of visual delight – all at once.  Does it make sense, then, to stick with the traditional distinction between "speech acts" (focused on words) and "imag