Skip to main content

The #monkepox noise on social media highlights the challenges of responsible health communication

The ongoing noise on social media after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the monkeypox multi-country outbreak is a ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ (PHEIC) is a clear example of the challenges our world faces when it comes to health communication. 

A quick look at the #monkepox hashtag is enough to realise that instead of a collective discussion on how to prevent the spread of the virus or help those affected by it has fragmented into a myriad of politicised narratives that I’d rather overlook here to focus on my argument. 


While my argument is far from straightforward (and what is these days?), the problem is somehow evidenced by the latest WHO statement that members within the International Health Regulations Emergency Committee ‘did not reach a consensus regarding their advice’.


Digital communication platforms hinder focused health communication


If we were in a world where public discussions about health were mostly mediated by mainstream media, we would be able to expect attention to focus on the arguments in support and not in support of the prospective determination of a PHEIC systematically outlined by the WHO Director-General in the Conclusions section of its 23 July statement. 


Processes of discursive fragmentation like the one going on around monkeypox adds to the complexity that Schiavo identifies when defining the role of health communication in ‘encouraging and supporting people to adopt and sustain healthy behaviors, or policymakers and professionals to introduce new policies and practices, or health care professionals to provide adequate and culturally competent care’. 


What happens instead is that, in the hybrid system of digital communication that exists today, the wide array of actors that enter the competition to frame the significance of health emergencies (such as #monkeypox at the moment) shatters the possibility of public conversation.


With the fragments apart, conditions for mis- and disinformation, or simply the accelerating rate at which individuals become put off subjects, contaminate the conditions for focused and sustained attention.


This is not to say some remarkable voices that use digital communication to promote dialogue don't exist as the screenshot included in this post suggests. One of the challenges for health communicators is to explore forms through which the visibility of such voices can be highlighted.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Overcoming Media Reluctance: How a Diverse Messaging Strategy Can Boost Vaccination Advocacy

As the UK grapples with the resurgence of whooping cough, it becomes increasingly important for public health messaging to adopt a nuanced and multi-strategy approach to vaccination appeals. In recent weeks, the UK has witnessed a notable surge in whooping cough cases, a severe infection particularly dangerous to children and pregnant women. Public health messaging has strongly emphasized vaccination as a crucial measure to combat this infection. Naturally, this is the case in the official communication of the UK Health Security Agency. BBC's coverage highlights worrying rise of cases However, a quick examination of the mainstream media coverage reveals what could be described as a hesitancy to include direct vaccination appeals, as can be surmised from a BBC’s report  which emphasized the threatening aspect, and a local news report which highlighted its regional spread . While mentioning a decline in vaccination rates, the coverage avoided direct calls to vaccinate and mere...

When a man is so bad he doesn't deserve a pig's heart

(Gabriel Moreno) - In words of The Washington Post writers , David Bennett became 'a medical pioneer' after the heart of a genetically modified pig was used to replace his failing heart. But the significance of this medical breakthrough in which he had been involved was eclipsed by the fact he 'had been convicted in 1988' after stabbing a man seven times. Attention grabbing as Johnson and Wan's article is, the so called 'ethics of a second chance' angle it deploys belongs within a category of public discourse that has taxed the ability of societies to deal with the organ shortage crisis  all over the world. For several decades, medical and social scientists have known that news media are one of the most effective forms of public education interventions to reduce the shortage of organs for patients who need a transplant for a shot at carrying on with their lives.  As put by Rafael Matesanz , architect of Spain's renowned national system of transplantation...

Organ transplants: why so many people are put off donating

Organ transplants: why so many people are put off donating irinabdw/Shutterstock (I'm republishing this article from The Conversation partly as an opportunity to acknowledge the progress that the UK has made towards reducing the number of cases in which families refuse to donate the organs of loved ones after they die. With the consent/authorisation rate going up 2% in 2018/19 to 67%, the country is much closer to the 80% target that would dramatically improve transplant outcomes, per the latest   Organ Donation and Transplantation Activity Report . But there is more work to be done) Gabriel Moreno Esparza , Northumbria University, Newcastle and Stephen Clark , Northumbria University, Newcastle It’s well known that there’s a worldwide shortage of organ donors. More than 100,000 organ transplants have taken place around the world every year since 2008 but this is way below what’s needed . In the UK , for example, fi...