Skip to main content

Navigating the thorny issue of persuasion in health communication

Health communication plays a crucial role in shaping attitudes and behaviors that impact the well-being of individuals and communities. 

However, the notion of persuasion in public health communication has become a subject of concern, as it raises questions about how government agencies and experts address knowledge gaps and public ignorance.

In the social media communicational landscapes of today, health officers tend to tread carefully to avoid appearing patronizing or paternalistic.

Nuanced landscape for health communication in the age of 
social media (Created with content of this post via OpenAI)

Navigating language and perception

As revealed by Charles Briggs' interviews with health officials in California, there is unease regarding certain words used in health campaigns. 

Terms like "message," "public," and "target" are perceived as projecting a top-down approach and demographic profiling. 

To address this concern, some of Brigg’s interviewees nurtured empathy in their views of the public as neighbours, family, and friends.

Visualizing member's of one's community can help health
communicators (Created with OpenArt)

Persuasion at the heart of social media use

And yet, the notion of persuasion lurks in health communication endeavours. Social media has become an integral part of health communication strategies. 

Such is a dimension made visible by Auger's work on the Twitter communication of charitable organizations in the health, environmental, and human services sectors, as documented by Auger.

These institutions often employ one-way communication methods to promote events, seek support, and foster dialogue. 

Auger's account highlights the persuasive nature of such communication, as these organizations actively work towards achieving specific goals and agendas.

Public scepticism adds complexity

In the age of social media, organizations drive to persuade is at odds with the amplification of public scepticism, making vocabulary a crucial aspect of health communication. 

Communicators must then navigate a landscape where they need to continually work on building their trust and credibility, hoping to reduce public doubt.

Building and strengthening relationships

One approach to address these anxieties is to embrace the fact that health agencies, healthcare providers, and governments have specific aims and objectives when communicating with the public.

Kate Smitko's work on donor engagement through Twitter illustrates this perspective, framing communication on social media platforms as an opportunity to build and strengthen relationships with donors.

Smitko’s approach is helpful to realize that when a clear and unequivocal public health interest is at stake, the persuasive nature of health communication is justified, and should therefore be deployed transparently.

This must be done with sensitivity, taking into account the concerns raised by health officers about language use and public perception. 

Permanent community building and maintenance efforts of a dialogical nature, as suggested by Auger, are arguably essential for public engagement that can translate in constructive health attitudes and behaviours. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Overcoming Media Reluctance: How a Diverse Messaging Strategy Can Boost Vaccination Advocacy

As the UK grapples with the resurgence of whooping cough, it becomes increasingly important for public health messaging to adopt a nuanced and multi-strategy approach to vaccination appeals. In recent weeks, the UK has witnessed a notable surge in whooping cough cases, a severe infection particularly dangerous to children and pregnant women. Public health messaging has strongly emphasized vaccination as a crucial measure to combat this infection. Naturally, this is the case in the official communication of the UK Health Security Agency. BBC's coverage highlights worrying rise of cases However, a quick examination of the mainstream media coverage reveals what could be described as a hesitancy to include direct vaccination appeals, as can be surmised from a BBC’s report  which emphasized the threatening aspect, and a local news report which highlighted its regional spread . While mentioning a decline in vaccination rates, the coverage avoided direct calls to vaccinate and mere

Organ transplants: why so many people are put off donating

Organ transplants: why so many people are put off donating irinabdw/Shutterstock (I'm republishing this article from The Conversation partly as an opportunity to acknowledge the progress that the UK has made towards reducing the number of cases in which families refuse to donate the organs of loved ones after they die. With the consent/authorisation rate going up 2% in 2018/19 to 67%, the country is much closer to the 80% target that would dramatically improve transplant outcomes, per the latest   Organ Donation and Transplantation Activity Report . But there is more work to be done) Gabriel Moreno Esparza , Northumbria University, Newcastle and Stephen Clark , Northumbria University, Newcastle It’s well known that there’s a worldwide shortage of organ donors. More than 100,000 organ transplants have taken place around the world every year since 2008 but this is way below what’s needed . In the UK , for example, figures

When multimodal speech speaks a thousand images and words

In today's communication landscape, multimodal speech, based on text, emojis, links, pictures and more arguably augments the nature of our messages  As part of a literature review I've been working on the use of speech acts on social media, I came across the distinction that authors of a study make between "Speech and Image Acts" in branding messages on social media.  Having for sometime settled for the idea that speech acts are multimodal in today's hybrid polymedia system, I wander whether the need to distinguish between speech and image acts is necessary.  Multimodal speaks a thousand images and words: replacing the old adage (Created with ChatGPT) The way we communicate online defies simple categorization. A single social media post can be a demand, a plea, an informative statement, and a source of visual delight – all at once.  Does it make sense, then, to stick with the traditional distinction between "speech acts" (focused on words) and "imag